2/26/2024 0 Comments Aero gigabyte 15 geekbench 4The AERO's overall score is quite high here, performing on par with more powerful and expensive machines like the Razer Blade 16 and leaving more similar laptops like the Vivobook 16 Pro and Dell XPS 17 in the dust. Essentials tests day-to-day workloads like web browsing and video conferencing, Productivity measures office applications like spreadsheet and document creation, and the DCC category tests photo and video creation and editing workloads. Moving on to another varied test of the system's capabilities, PCMark 10 breaks out its testing into Essentials, Productivity, and Digital Content Creation categories that test different kinds of workloads. If your primary workflow involves long-running CPU intensive tasks like exporting hundreds of heavily edited image files in Lightroom, it's worth keeping these results in mind. This is a good reminder of why one benchmark can't possibly tell the whole story. When it comes to a more varied set of workloads that don't stress the CPU for nearly as long, the Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED does just fine and we see it rise through the ranks, outperforming the XPS 15 and XPS 17, as well as the Vivobook 16 Pro that uses the same CPU. However, there's probably still some score creep due to Chrome updates in the meantime. ![]() We always run this test on the latest version of Chrome, so to limit the results in the chart to the most relevant comparisons we've removed any laptops that were tested before March of this year. One important note: the scores on this benchmark are going to be affected by both the computer's hardware and any optimizations that may have been made to your browser of choice. It should give us a good sense of overall web app performance across all sorts of different applications. To test web app performance, we use 's Speedometer benchmark, which loads and runs a bunch of sample web applications built on a range of development frameworks. That's a little slower than we typically see from similar drives. The only head scratcher is the write speed, which peak just below 4.5GB/s before plateauing at around 3.3GB/s. Maximum sequential read speeds are very snappy at over 6GB/s and IOPS are pretty impressive as well. ![]() The AERO 16 OLED puts in a solid performance here. For a PCIe Gen 4.0 drive we'd expect to peak around 4-6GB/s writes and 5-6GB/s reads, and clock around 100K IOPS for the smallest data sizes. Finally, the battery tests were run in both Intel and NVIDIA graphics output modes, to see if there was a battery penalty to running the display off of the discrete GPU.ĪTTO Disk measures read/write bandwidth and IOPS for a bunch of different data sizes ranging from 512 bytes up to 64MB, and it's a quick way to check if the NVMe drive in your system is performing at the level you would expect given the spec. Unsurprisingly, there wasn't much of a difference, so we left those results out of the charts to minimize clutter. The user mode was set to Power for all of our testing, although we did try switching the computer's fan mode into "Turbo" for a few tests to see if there was any significant performance uplift. All tests were run with the latest NVIDIA Studio driver installed, since that's more common for this type of computer rather than the Game Ready driver, and both the BIOS and Windows 11 Pro were updated prior to testing. ![]() It's pretty obvious we like how Gigabyte built and designed the AERO 16 OLED, especially that OLED display, but that won't mean much if the computer can't keep up with graphically intense workloads.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |